intermountain-legal-logo-white-newintermountain-legal-logo-white-newintermountain-legal-logo-white-newintermountain-legal-logo-white-new
  • Criminal Defense
    • Drug or Alcohol Related
      • DUI Charges
        • Alcohol Restricted Driver
        • Ignition Interlock Restricted Driver
        • Sobriety Tests
          • Field Sobriety Tests FSTS
          • Breath Tests Blood Tests
        • Automobile Homicide
        • DUI Drug Charges
      • Drug Charges
        • Drug Possession
          • Possession of Marijuana
          • Possession of Oxycontin
          • Possession of Paraphernalia
          • Possession of Methamphetamine
          • Cocaine
          • Ecstacy MDMA
      • DUI and Drunk Driving Defense
      • Medical Marijuana
      • Underage Drinking / Minor in Possession of Alcohol
      • Selling Alcohol to a Minor
    • Violent Crimes
      • Resulting in Death
        • Manslaughter
        • Negligent Homicide
        • Murder Homicide
      • Assault
      • Aggravated Assault
      • Robbery
      • Kidnapping
      • Reckless Endangerment
    • Domestic Violence
      • Utah Domestic Violence Laws
        • Threat Violence
        • Violation of a Protective Order
        • Violation of a no Contact Order
        • Interruption of a Communication Device
        • Domestic Violence in the Presence of a Child in Utah
      • Crimes Involving Children
        • Child Abuse
        • Custodial Interference
      • Domestic Violence Assault
      • Domestic Violence Criminal Mischief
      • Domestic Violence Criminal Trespass
    • Sex Crimes
      • Violent Sex Crimes
        • Sexual Assault
        • Sex Abuse
        • Rape
      • Other Sex Crimes
        • Statutory Rape
        • Prostitution
        • Sexual Solicitation
        • Lewdness
        • Voyeurism
    • Criminal Activity Defense
      • Misdemeanor Defense
        • Potential Harm or Harassment
          • Stalking
          • Electronic Communication Harassment
          • Disorderly Conduct
          • Utah Intoxication Attorney
        • Damage to Property
          • Graffiti Vandalism
          • Utah Criminal Mischief Attorney
          • Utah Criminal Trespass Lawyer
        • Serious Traffic Violations
        • Probation Violations
        • Gambling
      • Weapon Crimes
        • Gun & Weapons Charges
        • Possession of a Weapon or Firearm in an Airport
        • Discharge of a Firearm from a Vehicle
      • Conflicts with Police
        • Filing a False Police Report
        • Interference with Arresting Officer
        • False Information to a Police Officer
      • Juvenile Crimes
        • Utah Juvenile Court System
        • Juvenile Felony Charges
        • Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor
    • Theft and Fraud
      • Theft
        • Retail Theft Shoplifting
        • Embezzlement
        • Burglary
        • Robbery
        • Theft of Services
      • Fraud
        • Identity Theft
        • Check Fraud
        • Credit Card Fraud
        • Investor Fraud
      • White Collar Crimes
    • Record Expungements
      • Reduction of Criminal Convictions
      • Expungement Eligibility
    • Professional License Defense
    • Felony Defense
    • Common Questions
  • Family Law
    • Divorce
      • Contested Divorce
      • Uncontested Divorce
      • Divorce Decree Modification
      • Post Divorce Enforcement
    • Custody
      • Custody & Paternity
      • Custody Modification
    • Child Support Modification
    • Alimony & Spousal Support
    • Visitation & Parent Time
    • Mediation
    • Protective Orders
      • Defending A Protective Order
    • Other Practice Areas
      • Domestic Violence
      • Grandparent Visitation
      • Guardianship
      • Adoption
    • Common Questions
  • Appeals
  • Our Winning Strategy
    • Recent Case Victories
    • Testimonials
    • Accolades
  • Our Attorneys
    • Steve K Burton
    • Justin S Pratt
    • Staci Visser
    • Matthew Bell
    • Mark LaRocco
  • About
    • Find Us on the Web
  • Contact
  • (801) 970-2800
State of Utah v Larry Lewis Hutchings
April 22, 2020
State of Utah v Michael J Birkeland
April 22, 2020
April 22, 2020
Categories
  • Criminal Defense Past Cases
Tags

State Of Utah V. Lucia Arnold And Vanessa Arnold

2011 UT App 255
Filed August 4, 2011
Memorandum Decision

Lucia and Vanessa Arnold were charged with retail theft after security guards at Dillard’s department store saw them go into dressing rooms with clothes and shopping bags and then come out later with no clothes and bags that appeared much fuller. Store security cameras corroborated the guards’ observations. The shopping bags contained shoe boxes filled with bundled clothes. Police found similar bundles in the Arnolds’ car. At their preliminary hearing, the Arnolds stated that after their arrest a deputy sheriff had threatened Vanessa with a gun and demanded that she drop a pending civil law suit against him. The State made a motion to exclude evidence of the alleged threat, which the district court granted. A jury convicted the Arnolds at trial and they appealed to the Utah Court of Appeals.

On appeal, the Arnolds argued ineffective assistance of counsel. They argued that the State opened the door to the treat evidence at trial when the prosecution asked witnesses why Dillard’s personnel would want to hurt the Arnolds, and so at that point their criminal defense attorney should have sought a release from the exclusion order.

In order to prove ineffective assistance of counsel, the Arnolds were required to show, first, that their criminal defense attorney’s failure to reintroduce the threat evidence fell below and objective standard of professional judgment. The court of appeals found that their lawyer’s decision did not meet this standard because there was a valid tactical basis for the lawyer’s decision. Specifically, the officer who allegedly threatened Vanessa Arnold was out of the country at the time of the arrest. Since the Arnold’s case depended on their credibility with the jury, their criminal defense attorney made a reasonable tactical decision not to introduce allegations that would have reflected negatively on their credibility.

To prevail on appeal, the Arnolds must also have proved that they were prejudiced by their criminal defense attorney’s tactical decision; that absent this decision the outcome of their trial would have been different. The Court of Appeals held that there was such an abundance of evidence against the Arnolds that any error on the part of their criminal defense attorney would not have changed the verdict.

Share
0

Related posts

April 22, 2020

State of Utah v David S Nielsen


Read more
April 22, 2020

State of Utah v David E Epling


Read more
April 22, 2020

State of Utah v Chanzy Walker


Read more

INTERMOUNTAIN LEGAL

Salt Lake City Office:

2159 S 700 E, Ste 240
Salt Lake City, UT 84106

Phone: 801-970-2800

Fax: 801-951-4901


Murray Office:

491 W 5300 S #117
Murray, UT 84123

Phone: 801-970-2800

Quicklinks:

Criminal Defense & DUI

Family Law & Divorce

Appeals

Personal Injury

Our Winning Strategy

Our Attorneys

Blog

© 2021 Intermountain Legal P.C. All Rights Reserved. Built by Incline Marketing